Unable to contend with the overwhelming evidence that verifies the serious health risks associated with the homosexual lifestyle, militants turn to "character assassination" to destroy the credibility of those who provide objective information.
I am an evil person.
No one likes me.
Conservatives won't associate with me. Libertarians despise me.
While the above may seem a bit crass, it is representative of the image homosexual extremists project to discredit those with whom they disagree.
For example...
On July 19th a conservative blog in Indiana fielded the suggestion that I become a regular contributing writer. A prominent leader in the militant homosexual movement objected with the following post:
But, seriously, Curt and Kurt... You don't want Kenn over here. While I often consider ya'll wingnut religious fanatics, Kenn's views tend to run without any respect for facts in the least. (See his ongoing defense of a "doctor" run out of every medical profession. Would you defend, say, a "Baptist" minister as a true Baptist if the congregation had removed him from office, aid he wasn't a true minister of their faith, and thoroughly discredited everything he had said?) While my current level of respect for the IFI is very low, adding Kenn would definitely lower your org in the eyes of other conservatives even... He can't even play the "Libertarian" card anymore since he left the arty/wasNote the strategy used.
kicked out - depending on who you talk to.
• I can't be trusted to tell the truth.
• Associating with me would damage their image among their peers (conservatives)
• I've been abandoned by my own peer group (libertarians).
• Disinformation: A false rumor (lie) is injected suggesting I have been "kicked out" of the Libertarian Party.
• Lacking is any evidence of erroneous reporting.
Taking is personally
Unfortunately, the blacklisting strategy is effective. Here's what I have personally observed:
• Since mid-2006 when homosexual activists rose to prominence in the Libertarian Party of Indiana, conservatives and evangelicals were marginalized, criticized, ignored and, at times, met with hostility.
• When invited to participate in a movement to end property taxes in Indiana, I forewarned the organizer that I had been tagged by militant homosexuals as an "undesirable." After some initial investigation, he confirmed my warning.
Unfortunately, many conservatives unwittingly accept slander as fact. In some cases they actually help spread the rumors.
It should be noted that not all homosexuals engage in such visceral hatred. But many — perhaps most — do.
It stands to reason: If homosexuals don't mind destroying other homosexuals with lies regarding the health risks of their lifestyle, they certainly won't hesitate to destroy the reputations of those who disagree.
About "the doctor"
The physician to whom the writer refers is, apparently, Dr. Paul Cameron who has, indeed, born the brunt of continual disinformation and character assaults by militant homosexuals. Dr. Cameron is typical of those targeted by militant homosexuals with their visceral hatred.
What the militants won't tell you is that Dr. Cameron's research has been corrobborated by research from other respected scholars. Their methods may have been different, but the outcomes were the same. These are posted elsewhere on this site.
Nor will the militants tell you that Dr. Cameron's research was dismissed by a Texas judge with a long history of judicial activism.
The militants failed to mention that intimidation efforts — like the one posted above — were used against Dr. Cameron to alienate him from certain professional peer groups.
They also don't want you to know that there are hundreds of scholarly research papers and articles relating to the health risks of homosexuality. NOT ONE of these even suggests that the gay lifestyle is healthy. So why do they single out Cameron? Because he is vocal and effective.
Again...
In spite of their best efforts to discredit those who provide objective research, such research is corroborated by hundreds of objective scholarly studies and reports that accurately research the homosexual lifestyle. NOT ONE indicates that lifestyle is anything other than a serious health risk. [View links to studies here]
